|
By SUSAN SMALLHEER If Monday’s drill had been
a real emergency, people in the town of “ It is the second time the
notification test has had major problems since November. Stowell said the The state has long wanted to
change that system, he said, because of inherent problems with getting to the
fire station in time to set off the alarms. “What if there was a
terrible snowstorm?” Stowell pointed out. Stowell said one of the two
pagers carried by emergency personnel in During a drill, the sirens
are not set off, but personnel have to go through all the steps leading up to
it, he said. Stowell said the state had
been unable to talk with the second But Stowell’s report,
which was prompted by a complaint on Monday by anti-nuclear activist Gary Sachs
of According to state and
federal regulations, the state has 30 minutes to notify its residents in the
event of an emergency at the Sachs had complained that
the state hadn’t met its timeliness requirement, and he questioned whether the
30-minute period was realistic as well. “If it takes 28 minutes
for them to begin notification of evacuation, how long will it take for a plume
to take to get five miles away?” “I would like to know what
is the worst-case scenario on which they are basing the plan,” he said. “Why
have a plan at all?” “Here’s two tests that
have failed since November. Let’s stop testing fast-breaker. Why don’t they
just test the basic evacuation plan?” Stowell said that Entergy
Nuclear officials had agreed just prior to the monthly drill to install the new
remote-access alert system in People living closest to the
plant and in downtown There were also minor
problems with the National Weather Service, which had been slower than federal
requirements in setting off the tone alert radios. The Weather Service, which
is based in If it had been a real
emergency, the nuclear plant would have taken precedent, he said. “Emergency Management has
proposed a more automated notification system in previous budgets and was hoping
to procure and implement a new system in FY 2004,” Stowell wrote. “Such a
system would speed up notifications and subsequent responses by responders. It
is unclear at this time whether we will be able to do this in FY 2004.” Stowell, the state’s
planner, had triggered the emergency drill at Robert O. Williams,
spokesman for Entergy Nuclear, said the company did not participate in the drill
and he referred all comment to Stowell. He said the company had its
own five-person emergency planning department, but by federal law, the utility
plans for emergencies within the plant and the state is responsible for planning
outside the plant’s fences. The state has been
conducting the “fast-breaker” drills since 2000. The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency require that there be
such a plan, but have no requirement for testing it. There were problems with the
fast-break drill in November 2002, as well. |