State cool to Entergy plan to warm river

July 15, 2003

By SUSAN SMALLHEER Southern Vermont Bureau

Entergy Nuclear has done an inadequate job of evaluating the effects of warmer water on both Atlantic salmon smolts and migrating American shad in the Connecticut River , the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources said in a letter released Tuesday.

The letter largely agrees with concerns raised by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in April, which also faulted Entergy for not providing adequate information that the salmon and shad will be protected.

Entergy Nuclear wants to increase the temperature of the water it discharges into the Connecticut River by one degree, in order to save money on operating its cooling towers. The increased temperatures would be in effect from May through October.

Entergy’s proposal would allow the temperature in the river to be between two and five degrees higher than surrounding levels downstream.

The change is requested for times when the river is between 55 degrees up to 78 degrees.

Carol Carpenter, an environmental analyst with the Department of Environmental Conservation, said the state’s comments were based on comments from state fisheries biologists from Vermont , New Hampshire and Massachusetts .

“We want to make sure there’s no adverse effect on the fish. The warm water discharge permit is completely separate from Entergy’s plans to increase power production at the plant by 20 percent, which still needs state and federal approval.”

In a letter to Entergy Nuclear dated last Friday, the state said that additional studies and work were needed to answer the state’s questions.

“The downstream migration of salmon smolts has not been adequately addressed. A more comprehensive and detailed assessment is warranted,” wrote Brian D. Kooiker, chief of the discharge permits section in the Department of Environmental Conservation.

Likewise, the state has raised questions about the warmer temperature and the effect it might have on the migration of shad.

“The fisheries biologists are concerned that shad may be avoiding the area at the bottom of the fish ladder due to temperature differentials between the fish ladder discharge and the surrounding areas,” Kooiker said.

The state relied on a 86-page draft report prepared by Versar Inc., an environmental consulting firm in Columbia , Md. The report was paid for by Entergy Nuclear.

And according to two research scientists with the United States Geologic Survey in Massachusetts , cited in the Versar report, native warm water species in the area are “likely to be harmed by increases in temperatures when river temperatures are near their thermal limits.”

The scientists, Stephen McCormick and Alex Haro, recommended that temperatures in the river not be allowed to rise over 80 degrees until after July 10, to protect the spawning shad.

The state’s letter echoes many of the concerns raised by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

“Entergy Nuclear’s proposal has the potential to impact certain life stages of Atlantic salmon and American shad,” wrote Janice N. Rowan, the Connecticut River coordinator for the Fish and Wildlife Service’s office in Sunderland , Mass.

“The documentation provided to date by Entergy Nuclear in support of their request does not adequately demonstrate that their proposal will assure the protection of salmon and shad when ambient water temperatures are above 68 degrees,” she added.

Rowan said Monday that if shad, in particular, “hit a thermal wall” they won’t go farther up the river.

Brian Cosgrove, spokesman for Entergy Nuclear, said the company was committed to pursuing the increase in discharge water.

“We’re having conversations with the folks at ANR (the Agency of Natural Resources), and we’re working with them,” he said.

Cosgrove said that he had no estimate on how much money would be saved by not using the cooling towers, even for only a degree or two.

“We want to put more power on the grid,” he said. “You look for efficiencies wherever you can.”

Cosgrove said that the power production increase was separate from the discharge permit. “The (power) uprate will go forward with or without this,” he said.

Carpenter said when and if Entergy Nuclear satisfies the state’s concerns, a draft permit would be written and a public hearing would be held.

Contact Susan Smallheer at susan.smallheer@rutlandherald.com.