|
State finds
too many questions on Yankee plan
By SUSAN SMALLHEER MONTPELIER — There are too many unanswered questions about Entergy
Nuclear’s plan to boost power production by 20 percent at the Vermont Yankee
nuclear power plant, according to the state. In testimony filed with the Public Service Board, the Public Service
Department said Friday that Entergy Nuclear hadn’t made its case that the $60
million project was in the best interests of the state and deserved a
certificate of public good. However, the state’s nuclear engineer, William Sherman, said that more
information from Entergy Nuclear about its plans might change the state’s
evaluation. “Both the benefits and the costs of the proposal are small,” “If these concerns were resolved, the department could recommend Entergy be
granted a certificate of public good,” The Public Service Department acts as the public’s advocate in Entergy’s
effort to increase power at the 31-year-old reactor. Entergy must receive both
state and federal approval for the plan, which has run into local opposition
with residents and activists concerned about putting additional pressure on an
aging plant. Two weeks ago, the Public Service Board held a hearing in Many people claimed there was no economic benefit to Vermonters from the
increased power production. They said increased production would aggravate the
problem of the plant lacking storage for its spent uranium fuel, which is
considered highly radioactive. At the time, residents criticized Entergy for not disclosing exactly how it
would increase production, something the company says is still under evaluation.
Vermont Yankee would be only the fourth plant in the country to get
permission to increase power production by 20 percent. There are 104 commercial
nuclear reactors in the country and Vermont Yankee is one of the oldest and
smallest of the reactors. Vermont Yankee’s prior owners, a consortium of Entergy Nuclear, based in Entergy Nuclear spokesman Robert Williams said that the company had a copy of
the state’s filing, but he declined to make a specific comment. “We’re still in the process of reviewing it and we look forward to
presenting our side in the upcoming hearings,” he said. Contact Susan Smallheer at susan.smallheer@rutlandherald.com. |